MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coastal Benthic Habitat Mapping to Support Marine Resource Planning and Management in St. Kitts and Nevis

2011· article· en· W1798178733 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Steven R. Schill, John English Knowles, Gwilym Rowlands, Shawn W. Margles, Vera N. Agostini, Ruth Blyther

Bibliographic record

VenueGeography Compass · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of NottinghamYork UniversityUniversity of WashingtonUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsBenthic habitatBenthic zoneHabitatGeographyResource (disambiguation)Marine protected areaEnvironmental resource managementFisheryOceanographyEcologyEnvironmental scienceGeologyComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A benthic habitat mapping method was applied in St. Kitts and Nevis to create baseline data that serves as input for a marine resource management framework. High resolution satellite imagery (<4 m pixel), combined with an extensive field survey, facilitated the creation of the first high resolution benthic habitat maps for the coastal waters of St. Kitts and Nevis. We demonstrate how Small Island Developing States (SIDS) with limited resources, can employ a scientifically sound, yet relatively low‐cost method to develop coastal benthic habitat maps. These data, along with other marine use information, were reviewed through stakeholder involvement and fed into a larger project aimed at drafting a federation‐wide multi‐objective marine zoning plan. The benthic habitat data quantified the spatial extent and location of key marine ecosystems and served as one of the critical data layers used in the marine zoning decision‐support software. The modeled outputs provided insight to marine resource managers making decisions on how to balance both environmental and economic needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeography CompassSame topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207