MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1800617614 · doi:10.1039/c5cp01083g

Intense NIR emissions at 0.8 μm, 1.47 μm, and 1.53 μm from colloidal LiYbF<sub>4</sub>:Ln<sup>3+</sup> (Ln = Tm<sup>3+</sup> and Er<sup>3+</sup>) nanocrystals

2015· article· en· W1800617614 on OpenAlexafffund
Shyam Sarkar, Venkata N. K. B. Adusumalli, Venkataramanan Mahalingam, John A. Capobianco

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia UniversityCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsNanocrystalDopingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Thermal decompositionMaterials scienceLanthanideIonColloidPhoton upconversionChemistryNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the synthesis of diamond shaped Ln(3+)-doped LiYbF4 (Ln = Tm and Er) nanocrystals with flat edges via the thermal decomposition method. Strong near-infrared emissions at 0.8 μm, 1.47 μm and 1.53 μm are observed from colloidal dispersions of Tm(3+)-doped and Er(3+)-doped LiYbF4 nanocrystals, respectively, under 0.98 μm diode laser excitation. The NIR emission intensities for Tm(3+)-doped and Er(3+)-doped LiYbF4 nanocrystals are comparable with those of the sodium counterpart NaYbF4, suggesting that LiYbF4 is also an excellent host matrix for lanthanide ions to obtain strong NIR emissions in colloidal solutions of LiYbF4 (Tm(3+) or Er(3+)) nanocrystals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207