Immunogenicity of hylan g-f 20 in Guinea pigs and mice.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the product-specific immunogenicity of a chemically-modified sodium hyaluronate derivative, hylan G-F 20, that is used in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: Guinea pigs were subcutaneously immunized with hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) once a week for 3 weeks. After resting, these animals received an intradermal challenge with hylan to elicit allergic skin reactions. Animal sera were tested for the presence of hylan-specific antibodies by homologous passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) assay and of anti-hylan IgG by ELISA. Further, mice were similarly immunized with hylan, and their sera were analyzed by heterologous PCA assay in rats and by ELISA for anti-hylan Ig(G+M) and anti-hylan IgE. RESULTS: In the guinea pig studies, acute and delayed erythematous skin reactions were elicited in immunized animals after the intradermal challenge with hylan. The sera of hylan-immunized guinea pigs showed positive reaction in the homologous PCA assay and significantly high amount of anti-hylan IgG, whereas the sera did not show any cross-reactivity against sodium hyaluronate. Hylan also exhibited immunogenicity in mice of 3 inbred strains, and C3H/HeN mice showed higher production of anti-hylan antibodies than Balb/c and C57BL/6 mice. CONCLUSION: Hylan G-F 20 exhibited immunogenicity in guinea pigs and mice. Recent reported severe acute inflammatory reactions in human patients after repeated intraarticular injections of hylan G-F 20 might involve product-specific, immune-mediated mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".