MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1802444145 · doi:10.37236/2698

Product Dimension of Forests and Bounded Treewidth Graphs

2013· preprint· en· W1802444145 on OpenAlexaff
L. Sunil Chandran, Rogers Mathew, Deepak Rajendraprasad, Roohani Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · 2013
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersMicrosoft Research
KeywordsCombinatoricsTreewidthMathematicsBounded functionDimension (graph theory)Upper and lower boundsDiscrete mathematicsGraphProduct (mathematics)Partial k-treeChordal graphPathwidth1-planar graphLine graphGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The product dimension of a graph $G$ is defined as the minimum natural number $l$ such that $G$ is an induced subgraph of a direct product of $l$ complete graphs. In this paper we study the product dimension of forests, bounded treewidth graphs and $k$-degenerate graphs. We show that every forest on $n$ vertices has product dimension at most $1.441 \log n + 3$. This improves the best known upper bound of $3 \log n$ for the same due to Poljak and Pultr. The technique used in arriving at the above bound is extended and combined with a well-known result on the existence of orthogonal Latin squares to show that every graph on $n$ vertices with treewidth at most $t$ has product dimension at most $(t+2)(\log n + 1)$. We also show that every $k$-degenerate graph on $n$ vertices has product dimension at most $\lceil 5.545 k \log n \rceil + 1$. This improves the upper bound of $32 k \log n$ for the same by Eaton and Rődl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Electronic Journal of CombinatoricsSame topicGraph Labeling and Dimension ProblemsFrench-language works237,207