Soil hydrodynamics and controls in prairie potholes of central Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The soil moisture contents of the upland soils surrounding prairie wetlands are significant in regulating processes (e.g. infiltration, run‐off and evapotranspiration) that control the prairie wetlands' water balances and fluctuations. In this research, the soil moisture data were collected with Time Domain Reflectometer (TDR) and their distributions were characterised across sites with varying climatic regime, basins with varying wetland classes and various topographic positions, during the snow‐free period. The soil moisture contents of basins were variable among regions of Prairie Potholes Region (e.g. Hartt = 0.35 m 3 m −3 and Old Wives = 0.18 m 3 m −3 ) and their variability was related to regional Precipitation–Potential Evapotranspiration (P‐PET) gradient, particularly for the northern sites (r 2 = 0.98). Additionally, the soil moisture statuses was temporally variable during the snow‐free period (e.g. June = 0.27 m 3 m −3 and August = 0.17 m 3 m −3 ) and the variability displayed considerable relationship with daily P‐PET (r 2 = 0.63). At a local scale, the soil moisture content of the basins were structured by wetland class, position within the prairie basin (uplands = 0.17 m 3 m −3 and lowlands = 0.27 m 3 m −3 ), reflective of topographic effects, and the presence and permanence of wetlands (e.g. Class I = 0.18 m 3 m −3 , Class II = 0.21 m 3 m −3 , Class III = 0.22 m 3 m −3 and Class IV = 0.24 m 3 m −3 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it