Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author aims to demonstrate that the archival system in Québec corresponds to the model developed by the International Council on Archives and UNESCO. According to this model, an archival system must be based on formal legislation and incorporate a management structure. It must also include strategies for professional standardization and provide for the dissemination of the archival heritage. In support of his argument, the author reviews the history of the archives of Québec from the 17th century. Initially used for administrative purposes, archives became, during the 19th century, the principal resource for historical research. This perception of their function did not change until the second half of the 20th century, especially during the 1960s and 1970s. During that period the elements of an integrated records management system began to emerge when the Archives nationales du Québec (ANQ) was established in 1969. From that date, the ANQ developed all the elements necessary to fulfil its mandate to preserve its institutional memory as well as the nation’s collective memory.RÉSUMÉLe Québec s’est doté d’un véritable système d’archives qui correspond au modèle développé par le CIA et l’UNESCO. Selon ce modèle, un système d’archives doit reposer sur un cadre juridique formel et comporter une structure de gestion. Il doit également comprendre des stratégies de normalisation scientifique et prévoir la diffusion de son patrimoine archivistique. Pour les besoins de sa démonstration, l’auteur retracera le chemin parcouru par la province, en matière d’archives, depuis le 17e siècle. D’abord utilisées à des fins administratives, les archives deviennent, au 19e siècle, la source principale de la recherche historique. Il faudra toutefois attendre la seconde moitié du 20e siècle pour que la perception à l’égard des archives se transforme. Les années 60 et 70 seront à cet égard significatives. On y voit, en effet, se profiler les premiers éléments d’un système de gestion documentaire intégré alors que sont créées en 1969 les ANQ. Au fil des ans, cette institution se dotera des outils nécessaires à la réalisation de son mandat qui consiste non seulement à préserver sa mémoire institutionnelle mais également la mémoire collective de la nation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".