MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1803730007

The Archives nationales du Québec: Memory of a Nation

2005· article· fr· W1803730007 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gilles Héon

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandatePolitical scienceHumanitiesNational archivesLibrary scienceHistoryEthnologyArtLawComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author aims to demonstrate that the archival system in Quebec corresponds to the model developed by the International Council on Archives and UNESCO. According to this model, an archival system must be based on formal legislation and incorporate a management structure. It must also include strategies for professional standardization and provide for the dissemination of the archival heritage. In support of his argument, the author reviews the history of the archives of Quebec from the 17th century. Initially used for administrative purposes, archives became, during the 19th century, the principal resource for historical research. This perception of their function did not change until the second half of the 20th century, especially during the 1960s and 1970s. During that period the elements of an integrated records management system began to emerge when the Archives nationales du Quebec (ANQ) was established in 1969. From that date, the ANQ developed all the elements necessary to fulfil its mandate to preserve its institutional memory as well as the nation’s collective memory. RESUME Le Quebec s’est dote d’un veritable systeme d’archives qui correspond au modele developpe par le CIA et l’UNESCO. Selon ce modele, un systeme d’archives doit reposer sur un cadre juridique formel et comporter une structure de gestion. Il doit egalement comprendre des strategies de normalisation scientifique et prevoir la diffusion de son patrimoine archivistique. Pour les besoins de sa demonstration, l’auteur retracera le chemin parcouru par la province, en matiere d’archives, depuis le 17e siecle. D’abord utilisees a des fins administratives, les archives deviennent, au 19e siecle, la source principale de la recherche historique. Il faudra toutefois attendre la seconde moitie du 20e siecle pour que la perception a l’egard des archives se transforme. Les annees 60 et 70 seront a cet egard significatives. On y voit, en effet, se profiler les premiers elements d’un systeme de gestion documentaire integre alors que sont creees en 1969 les ANQ. Au fil des ans, cette institution se dotera des outils necessaires a la realisation de son mandat qui consiste non seulement a preserver sa memoire institutionnelle mais egalement la memoire collective de la nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Same topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207