Acute head-down tilt decreases the postexercise resting threshold for forearm cutaneous vasodilation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of baroreceptor control on the postexercise threshold for forearm cutaneous vasodilation. On four separate days, six subjects (1 woman) were randomly exposed to 65 degrees head-up tilt and to 15 degrees head-down tilt during a No-Exercise and Exercise treatment protocol. Under each condition, a whole body water-perfused suit was used to regulate mean skin temperature (T(sk)) in the following sequence: 1) cooling until the threshold for vasoconstriction was evident; 2) heating ( approximately 7.0 degrees C/h) until vasodilation occurred; and 3) cooling until esophageal temperature (T(es)) and (T(sk)) returned to baseline values. The Exercise treatment consisted of 15 min of cycling exercise at 70% maximal O(2) uptake, followed by 15 min of recovery in the head-up tilt position. The No-Exercise treatment consisted of 30 min resting in the head-up tilt position. After the treatment protocols, subjects were returned to their pretreatment condition, then cooled and warmed again consecutively. The calculated T(es) threshold for cutaneous vasodilation increased 0.24 degrees C postexercise during head-up tilt (P < 0.05), whereas no difference was measured during head-down tilt. In contrast, sequential measurements without exercise demonstrate a time-dependent decrease for head-up tilt (0.17 degrees C) and no difference for head-down tilt. Pretreatment thresholds were significantly lower during head-down tilt compared with head-up tilt. We have shown that manipulating postexercise venous pooling by means of head-down tilt, in an effort to reverse its impact on baroreceptor unloading, resulted in a relative lowering of the resting postexercise elevation in the T(es) for forearm cutaneous vasodilation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".