The G2019S <i>LRRK2</i> mutation in Brazilian patients with Parkinson's disease: Phenotype in monozygotic twins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutations in the Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 gene (LRRK2) are mainly responsible for idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) with either a dominant pattern of transmission or a sporadic occurrence due to the reduced penetrance. A majority of LRRK2 kindreds demonstrate an extremely variable age-at-onset in affected members of the same family. The G2019S is the most common LRRK2 mutation, which accounts for 1-5% PD patients in North America, and up to 40% of patients from an isolated Arab population. We assessed the frequency of the G2019S mutation in 83 Brazilian PD patients originally preselected for having an early age-at-onset (<50 years) and/or a positive family history. The mutation was detected in three probands (3.5%). Our clinical findings in these kindreds include the first description of the phenotype in identical twins discordant for handedness (a general phenomenon found in approximately 25% monozygotic twins). However, both twins developed right asymmetric PD. The clinical presentation of twins was strikingly similar including an identical PD onset at age 60. This observation may suggest that genetic factors predominantly determine age-at-onset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".