MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1805556709 · doi:10.1520/stp11395s

Role of Microchemistry and Microstructure on Variability in Corrosion and Deuterium Uptake of Zr-2.5Nb Pressure Tube Material

2002· book-chapter· en· W1805556709 on OpenAlexaffabout
BD Warr, V. Perović, Lin Yp, Amanda Wallace

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsBruce Power (Canada)Kinectrics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrochemistryMicrostructureDeuteriumMaterials scienceTube (container)MetallurgyCorrosionChemistryComposite materialChromatographyPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the reasons for variability in D uptake in Canadian Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) reactor Zr-2.5Nb pressure tubes (PT)s will lead to improved surveillance and predictive strategies. Results from out-reactor aqueous exposures that suggest PT performance should be predictable based on offcut characteristics and may lead to the development of techniques to identify PTs with highest D uptake rates. The range of out-reactor corrosion and D uptake rates in Zr-2.5Nb coupons from different PT offcuts is similar to that found in test/power reactors. Out-reactor post-transition corrosion and D uptake rates at 310 and 360°C are found to be strongly correlated and decrease with increasing concentrations of Fe and Cr in the alloy. In the Bruce 3 reactor, PTs with higher D uptake show ‘curly’ α-β microstructures with a large number of basal planes (in the α-Zr grains), and β-Zr grains, oriented towards the radial direction of the tube. Since oxidized β-Zr regions are found to be associated with lateral cracking, the presence of a higher frequency of β-Zr grains aligned normal to the surface in these curly microstructures may result in increased routes for D uptake in this material. Oxide structure is also found to be dependent on the α-Zr orientation that results in different relative proportions of [001] growth versus general columnar oxide grains. Improved corrosion and D uptake performance is also found in Zr-2.5Nb material that is prefilmed (400°C for ≥24 h), β-quenched in the billet stage and in material from the back of the extrusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207