Phosphorylation state of the native high‐molecular‐weight neurofilament subunit protein from cervical spinal cord in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intraneuronal aggregation of phosphorylated high-molecular-weight neurofilament protein (NFH) in spinal cord motor neurons is considered to be a key pathological marker of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In order to determine whether this observation is due to the aberrant or hyper-phosphorylation of NFH, we have purified and characterized NFH from the cervical spinal cords of ALS patients and controls. We observed no differences between ALS and normal controls in the physicochemical properties of NFH in Triton X-100 insoluble protein fractions, with respect to migration patterns on 2D-iso electrofocusing (IEF) gels, the rate of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase mediated dephosphorylation, or the rate of calpain-mediated proteolysis. The rate of calpain-mediated proteolysis was unaffected by either exhaustive NFH dephosphorylation or by the addition of calmodulin to the reaction. Phosphopeptides and the phosphorylated motifs characterized by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS/MS) analysis demonstrated that all the phosphorylated residues found in ALS NFH were also found to be phosphorylated in normal human NFH samples. Hence, we have observed no difference in the physicochemical properties of normal and ALS NFH extracted from cervical spinal cords, suggesting that the perikaryal aggregation of highly phosphorylated NF in ALS neurons reflects the aberrant somatotopic localization of normally phosphorylated NFH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".