A National Survey of Canadian Psychiatry Residents' Perceptions of Psychotherapy Training
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore Canadian psychiatry residents' perceptions of their psychotherapy training and identify factors that may influence decisions to practise psychotherapy after graduation. METHOD: We surveyed psychiatry residents at all training sites across Canada, using a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 63%. Of the respondents, 68% indicated that the prospect of learning and practising psychotherapy was a factor in their decisions to become psychiatrists, and 87% considered their ability to practise psychotherapy to be important to their identities as psychiatrists. The majority of residents (71%) were generally satisfied with their psychotherapy training. Among the graduating class of residents, 84% anticipate practising psychotherapy in some capacity. Satisfaction with their overall training experience and supervision and feeling competent to perform psychotherapy were significantly associated with their decisions to practise psychotherapy after graduation. CONCLUSIONS: Most psychiatry residents currently enrolled in postgraduate training programs across Canada view psychotherapy as having an important role in the way they anticipate practising psychiatry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it