Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="htmlview paragraph">The rising cost of fuel, global warming and the economy in general has increased awareness about the importance of vehicle weight as it relates to consumer cost savings at the gas pump. However, vehicle safety cannot be compromised at the expense of reduced weight, making it necessary to find a proper balance to satisfy all requirements. The <i>Ultra brake rotor</i><sup>™</sup> reduces weight by as much as 40% for each wheel which translates to significant improvements as defined by CAFE regulations. Fully compatible with original calipers and other wheel components, these rotors additionally provide enhanced vehicle reliability and performance. Independent laboratory tests demonstrate compliance to FMVSS 135, and a 40% increase in rotor and brake pad wear life. Weight reduction is achieved by casting an aluminum core structure around steel wear inserts to form a strong mechanical bond. The 2007 GM Yukon front rotor cast from traditional grey iron steel weighs 26 pounds, while an equivalent <i>Ultra brake rotor</i> part contains 8 pounds of steel and 9 pounds of aluminum for a total weight of 17 pounds. Since aluminum has thermal conductivity properties superior to that of grey iron steel, performance improvements result from expected operation as friction heat is rapidly transferred from the steel inserts into the aluminum and then dissipated to air.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper details the test results to support 20 - 30% longer pad life, less rotor wear, with 40% reduction in weight when compared to conventional steel rotors.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".