The ArtAssist Device in chronic lower limb ischemia. A pilot study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic critical limb ischemia following a failed bypass graft or with non-reconstructable distal disease diagnosed angiographically, have a very poor prognosis. This is a prospective pilot study to assess the influence of the ArtAssist Device on pedal blood flow and amputation rate. METHODS: Thirty-three legs in 25 patients were evaluated. Ten legs presented with rest pain, and 23 legs with tissue loss. Nine legs had previously undergone bypass surgery. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 3 months, 14 (42%) legs were amputated, and 19 (58%) were saved. Eleven of the amputated legs were in patients with chronic renal failure, a known risk factor. The amputation rate, excluding this group, was 13.6% (3/22). Toe pressures measured initially and after 3 months on the pump showed a significant improvement (p=0.03). Forty percent of patients presenting with rest pain improved, while 26% of foot ulcers healed on the pump. Mortality rate was 12%. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this prospective study are encouraging but need to be validated in a larger prospective randomized study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".