CoS-Promoted MoS[sub 2] Catalysts for SOFC Using H[sub 2]S-Containing Hydrogen or Syngas as Fuel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With only as the anode catalyst, the performance of the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) using -containing as fuel increased with temperature. The highest current density was and the highest power density was at . When using pure , the performance was slightly lower. Impedance measurements showed that both ohmic resistance and polar resistance increased in the absence of . The performance of as an anode catalyst was significantly better when compared with alone. At , the maximum current density when using was and the maximum power density was . The performance of all the metal sulfide catalysts was decreased immediately on introduction of CO to the feed gas. The effect was reversible, and performance recovered after removal of CO from the feed stream. This showed that the effect was due to strong adsorption of CO on the catalytic sites, and that the effect could be reversed through continued operation of the SOFC. When the supply of CO was discontinued, oxygen ions transferred from the YSZ membrane reacted with adsorbed CO to regenerate the active sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".