MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1808083649 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.2372

Successful neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary invasive small-cell carcinoma of the ureter

2015· article· en· W1808083649 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kimito Osaka, Kazuki Kobayashi, Naoki Sakai, Sumio Noguchi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyUreterTransitional cell carcinomaUrologyCisplatinMetastasisPathologicalNeoadjuvant therapySurgeryInternal medicineCancerBladder cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of invasive small-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the ureter successfully treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. SCC of the ureter is an extremely rare condition characterized by aggressive behaviour. A 70-year-old male presented with left flank pain; he was diagnosed with SCC of the ureter, cT3N0M0, by ureteroscopic biopsy. The patient received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and irinotecan (IP) and underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. The pathological diagnosis was urothelial carcinoma, high grade, without a small-cell component. The pathological stage was down-staged to pT2N0M0. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed. The patient has been free of local recurrence or distant metastasis for 38 months postoperatively. This is the first reported case of primary invasive SCC of the upper urinary tract treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by nephroureterectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207