MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Brefeldin A Inhibits Circadian Remodeling of Chloroplast Structure in the Dinoflagellate <i>Gonyaulax</i>

2005· article· en· W1808386380 on OpenAlexaff
Nasha Nassoury, Yunling Wang, David Morse

Bibliographic record

VenueTraffic · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrenoidRuBisCOPlastidBiologyChloroplastBrefeldin ACell biologyBotanyBiochemistryPhotosynthesisGolgi apparatusEndoplasmic reticulum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circadian increases in the rate of carbon fixation in the dinoflagellate Gonyaulax are correlated with extensive plastid remodeling. One marker for this remodeling is mobilization of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) from the plastid periphery to plastid regions nearer the cell center called pyrenoids. Nuclear-encoded proteins such as Rubisco transit through the Golgi in dinoflagellates; hence, we blocked protein import into the plastids using Brefeldin A (BFA) to explore the mechanism for plastid remodeling. We find that pyrenoid formation normally occurs concurrently with increased Rubisco synthesis rates in vivo, and when BFA is given prior to the onset of Rubisco synthesis, pyrenoid formation is partially or completely inhibited by 0.1 or 0.3 microg/mL BFA, respectively. Rubisco synthesis itself is not affected, and BFA-treated cells accumulate Rubisco in novel structures we term BFA bodies. Interestingly, when given just after the onset of Rubisco synthesis, BFA delays but does not block Rubisco mobilization, suggesting that a timing signal for plastid remodeling is delivered to the organelles at the same time as newly synthesized Rubisco. BFA also inhibits the circadian increases in carbon fixation rates, supporting the hypothesis that the biochemical basis for this circadian rhythm may be Rubisco distribution within the plastid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrafficSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207