SISTEMATIZAÇÃO DE EXPERIÊNCIAS AGROECOLÓGICAS NO TERRITÓRIO SEMIÁRIDO NORDESTE II, BAHIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo tem como objetivo descrever e analisar o processo de sistematizacao de experiencias de agricultores familiares no Territorio Semiarido Nordeste II, Bahia, bem como fornecer pistas sobre sua contribuicao no fortalecimento da agroecologia na regiao. O Semiarido brasileiro e uma regiao que apresenta diversos problemas sociais e ambientais, que afetam principalmente as populacoes rurais. No entanto, observa-se a reproducao de diversas experiencias de convivencia com esse ambiente, utilizando-se praticas que materializam saberes que estao historicamente fundamentados em principios agroecologicos. A sistematizacao dessas experiencias e um processode reconstrucao analitica de uma determinada pratica, interpretada e analisada, juntamente com os sujeitos das experiencias, visando a sua compreensao e reproducao. A metodologia utilizada foi baseada em relatorias de visitas tecnicas e de intercâmbios, oficinas sobre sistematizacao de experiencias, memorias de reunioes e registros visuais, que reuniram as narrativas dos agricultores envolvidos no processo. O estudo favoreceu o fortalecimento da articulacao entre as instituicoes que atuam na assistencia tecnica, mostrando-se extremamente importante na qualificacao dos intercâmbios, nas interacoes em redes locais e regionais que visam ao aprendizado mutuo por meio dos conhecimentos extraidos das experiencias dos atores sociais, assim como na orientacao de politicas publicas relacionadas a agroecologia no territorio. Termos para indexacao: agroecologia, educacao popular, participacao social. SYSTEMATIZATION OF AGROECOLOGICAL EXPERIENCES IN THE TERRITORY OF SEMIARIDO NORDESTE II, IN STATE OF BAHIA, BRAZIL ABSTRACT This article aims to describe and analyze the process of systematization of experiences of family farmers in the territory of Semiarido Nordeste II, located in state of Bahia, Brazil, as well as to provide clues about how they contribute to strengthen the agroecology in that region. The Brazilian semiarid region has many social and environmental problems, particularly affecting rural populations. However, there are examples of many experiences of interaction with the environment, using practices that embody knowledge that is historically grounded in agroecological principles. The systematization of these experiences is a process of analytical reconstruction of a particular practice, which is interpreted and analyzed, along with the subjects of the experiments, seeking to understand and disseminate it. The methodology used was based on reports of technical visitations and exchanges, workshops on systematization of experiences, and recordings and visual records of meetings, which brought together the reports of the farmers involved in the process. The results favored the strengthening of the dialogue between the institutions involved in technical assistance in the region, proving to be extremely important in the classification of exchanges, in interactions in local and regional networks aimed at mutual learning through knowledge drawn from the experiences of these social actors, as well as in the orientation of public policies related to agroecology in that territory. Index terms: agroecology, popular education, social participation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".