MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1811018337

Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticity Task Force of InterPARES

2002· article· en· W1811018337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTask forceTask (project management)Library scienceArchival scienceMultidisciplinary approachPublic relationsSociologyPolitical scienceEngineeringComputer scienceSocial sciencePublic administration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

le projet InterPARES (International Research in Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems) s'est pench sur les problmes relis la conservation long terme de documents lectroniques authentiques.Dans le cadre du projet, c'est le groupe de travail sur l'authenticit qui fut charg d'laborer les exigences conceptuelles ncessaires l'valuation et au maintien de l'authenticit des documents lectroniques.Cet article prsente certains rsultats de la recherche du groupe de travail, dans la suite d'un article pcdent paru dans Archivaria 50.Il examine les resultats de analyse de systmes de documents lectroniques actifs dans la perspective de la diplomatique archivistique contemporaine et prsente la formulation dfinitive des exigences ncessaires l'valuation et au maintien de l'authenticit des documents lectroniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it