Newfoundland and Labrador on a Plate: Bed, Breakfast, and Regional Identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Culinary tourism is often a process of negotiation. This article explores the links between food production, place, and identity in the operation of bed and breakfasts (B&Bs) on Newfoundland’s west coast and the Labrador Straits. This area encompasses one of Newfoundland and Labrador’s major attractions, the Viking Trail. Due to the large number of tourists coming through and the relatively few restaurants in this area, some B&Bs offer evening meals as well as breakfast. Many offer local specialties, and almost all emphasize “home cooking.” Conversations around the dining table often concern the province and its culture, and provide B&B owners with an opportunity to perform local identities for their guests. Such presentations of self and place range from assertive refutations of the “Newfie” stereotype to semi-formal instruction. Proprietors may further frame the social aspects of the meal, and thus the performance as a whole, by assigning seating or moving guests through different spaces as the meal progresses. Through participant-observation and interviews with proprietors, this article concludes that these relatively informal social situations may facilitate significant intra- and intercultural exchanges. They enable communication that supports, personalizes, disrupts, and deconstructs both esoteric and exoteric grand narratives by utilizing a variety of strategies. These competing identities are shaped and maintained through formal and informal metaculinary discourse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".