The house of the unknown artist and the cosmopolitan imagination of urban memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article returns to a diverse body of literature that has identified urban memory as a specific category of cultural analysis. Yet, while the significance of memory to culture and the city is widely recognized, at the same time, more and more questions are surfacing around the status and meaning of the term urban. This article pursues the contemporary question of urban memory by turning to alternative urban cultural practices – specifically, urban intervention art projects – that elaborate upon the social imagination, settings and scenes of urban memory. The case study for this article concentrates on Toronto-based artist Iris Häussler’s The Legacy of Joseph Wagenbach, 2006, a project that convincingly staged the discovery of an unknown reclusive artist’s house and presented it to the public as a legitimate municipal archival assessment. This project examines the production of archival knowledge and urban memory through invention, performance and participation, and places memory at the crossroads of global city aspirations and rapid gentrification in downtown Toronto. This article will argue that this fabricated urban archive presents a number of archival lessons and houses a creative cosmopolitanism that asks us to identify with the life of a stranger. By placing The Legacy in dialogue with recent perspectives on the cosmopolitanism imagination, I will argue for the significance of not just imagination but memory to a reinvented, embedded cosmopolitanism that grows out of both ambivalence and reciprocity within the urban everyday.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.085 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".