MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1814065300 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-05-03629-9

Torsion subgroups of elliptic curves in short Weierstrass form

2005· article· en· W1814065300 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Bennett, Patrick Ingram

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHessian form of an elliptic curveTorsion (gastropod)Elliptic curveEdwards curvePure mathematicsJacobian curveMathematical analysisWeierstrass functionsSupersingular elliptic curveSchoof's algorithmQuarter period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent paper by M. Wieczorek, a claim is made regarding the possible rational torsion subgroups of elliptic curves <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper E slash double-struck upper Q"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">E/\mathbb {Q}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> in short Weierstrass form, subject to certain inequalities for their coefficients. We provide a series of counterexamples to this claim and explore a number of related results. In particular, we show that, for any <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="epsilon greater-than 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi> ε </mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\varepsilon &gt;0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , all but finitely many curves <disp-formula content-type="math/mathml"> \[ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper E Subscript upper A comma upper B Baseline colon y squared equals x cubed plus upper A x plus upper B comma"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>y</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">E_{A,B} \; : \; y^2 = x^3 + A x + B,</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> \] </disp-formula> where <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper A"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">A</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper B"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">B</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> are integers satisfying <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper A greater-than StartAbsoluteValue upper B EndAbsoluteValue Superscript 1 plus epsilon Baseline greater-than 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi> ε </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">A&gt;|B|^{1+\varepsilon }&gt;0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , have rational torsion subgroups of order either one or three. If we modify our demands upon the coefficients to <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="StartAbsoluteValue upper A EndAbsoluteValue greater-than StartAbsoluteValue upper B EndAbsoluteValue Superscript 2 plus epsilon Baseline greater-than 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi> ε </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">|A|&gt;|B|^{2+\varepsilon }&gt;0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , then the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper E Subscript upper A comma upper B"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">E_{A,B}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> now have trivial rational torsion, with at most finitely many exceptions, at least under the assumption of the abc-conjecture of Masser and Oesterlé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207