MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1814829504

Spatio-Temporal Ecology And Biology Of Listronotus Maculicollis Kirby (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) In New York Golf Gourses

2012· dissertation· en· W1814829504 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masanori Seto

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pest Control Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurculionidaeEcologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Listronotus maculicollis Kirby (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a serious pest of golf course turf in the northeastern United States and eastern Canadian provinces. To enhance current management strategies and to introduce novel management approaches, phenological, ecological and physiological characteristics of L. maculicollis were investigated. A three-parameter nonlinear logistic model, using 7.2 ˚C as a lower developmental threshold, was fitted to field-collected data of different developmental stages of two beetle populations from golf courses in New York and described their population accumulation patterns as a function of the degree-day accumulation within ± 7 days. The best models were further tested in a validation study encompassing sites that represented geographic/climatic ranges where L. maculicollis was known as a pest. Observed data tended to follow model predictions with respect to general pattern. Discrepancies were primarily due to faster population accumulation rates of each stage and/or greater synchrony than predicted. The results indicated site-specific variations in phenology. Further investigation about the effects of phenotypic plasticity, photoperiod, and adaptation to local habitat conditions on the phenology was suggested. The spatio-temporal dynamics of L. maculicollis, P. annua, and damage were investigated. Damage aggregated at the periphery of the fairway, the primary reproduction site for the beetle. It was spatially associated with larval density, thatch depth, and soil nitrate concentration. The crown feeding larvae and thatch (surface organic matter) were significantly associated with the occurrence of the damage. Association analysis indicated the crown feeding larvae were the primary cause of the damage and thatch provided a physical environment that was suitable for insect feeding and/or antagonistic to the plant's tolerance to the feeding. There was no significant association between P. annua density and plant damage or insect density. This result indicated that L. maculicollis pattern of colonization of turf areas was due to the physical environment that transitioned from high-mown turf to short-mown turf rather than a particular preference for P. annua. The fecundity of field-collected adults greatly differed between spring and summer. After the immigration to fairways from the overwintering site in April, the overwintered adults continuously oviposited eggs through June with great individual variation in number (0-84 eggs/individual). On the other hand, in July, when the majority of the field-collected adults were considered to be new adults of the following generation, they rarely laid eggs. The results challenge the current interpretation of L. maculicollis voltinism and indicated that the appearance of multiple generations might arise from the variation in the number of eggs oviposited by the overwintered adults and the continuous immigration of overwintered adults. Rearing methods with artificial diet and plant material were investigated. The developmental times of the insect, from egg to adult, on lettuce diet were normally distributed with large variance (25-113 days). This variation is a possible explanation of observed asynchronous populations in the field. The results imply the necessity of modifying the conventional views of the seasonal changes of L. maculicollis development that were largely based on anecdotal observation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeCommons (Cornell University)Same topicInsect Pest Control StrategiesFrench-language works237,207