Bibliographic record
Abstract
ongratulations to Past President Dr. Sender Herschorn and his team for an outstanding 2011 annual meeting in Montreal!! His scientific committee lead by Dr. Armen Aprikian produced an educational and entertaining academic event.Local organizing committee let by Serge Carrier and Francois Bénard put together a great social meeting (Montreal is such a great place!) and who knew Dr. Darrel Drachenberg was the next "Hendrix"!! Welcome to all the new members of the CUA and to the new CUA executive -this organization continues to evolve and grow but it will always rely and depend upon the volunteerism of the membership who put tireless hours into the day to day running and organization of the association and the annual meeting.Thank you to all those individuals who have served the Association and who are moving on to new challenges in their careers.Our strong, newly minted, Corporate Office in Montreal, is going to be central to our future success as an organization and provider of ongoing continuing medical education in Canada.We all live in a new fiscal reality, as does the CUA.The CUA and its membership will adapt to these changing environments and continue to produce strong, educational annual meetings and provide benefits for its membership.Lastly, mark on your calendar now the 2012 Annual Meeting of the CUA in Banff and the historic Banff Fairmont Resort, June 24-26, 2012!Drs.Jay Lee and Trevor Schuler have put together an outstanding list of guest speakers and will educate and distract you from the glorious natural beauty outside!Drs.Howard Evans and Marty Duffy know how to party like nobody else I know and trust me when I say their social agenda will keep you entertained!Lastly the spectacular natural beauty of Banff National Park needs little assistance in enticing you to come next June.Take some extra time off, bring family, (there are those mandatory summer OR closures anyway)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.531 | 0.366 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".