MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1817468013 · doi:10.1089/vor.2011.0048

Laparoscopic Excision of a Gastric Lymphatic Malformation

2011· article· en· W1817468013 on OpenAlexaff
Fady Gaied, Sherif Emil

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoscopy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuadrant (abdomen)Curvatures of the stomachGreater omentumCystSurgeryAnatomyAbdominal cavityStomachAdnexal massLesser sacLymphatic systemPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lymphatic malformations occurring within the abdominal cavity are rare benign lesions predominantly affecting the pediatric population. We report an acute presentation of an unusual and extensive lymphatic malformation, arising in the lesser sac, in a 15-year-old girl. After imaging, the cystic mass was thought to be of adnexal origin. A laparoscopic resection of this presumed adnexal mass was planned. A supra-umbilical, 12-mm trocar was placed by Hasson technique. A 5-mm, 30-degree scope was used to examine the abdominal cavity, revealing a large abdominal cyst that was mobile. Two more 5-mm trocars were then placed in the left lower and right lower quadrant regions. Manipulation of the mass demonstrated a nonpelvic origin and normal adnexae. The mass was connected by a twisted pedicle traveling over the transverse colon through the greater omentum. An omental origin was suspected at this point, but the superior border of the mass could not be delineated. Another 5-mm trocar was placed in the left upper quadrant to allow manipulation of the stomach. Further examination demonstrated the omentum to be simply adherent to the twisted pedicle, and not the source of it. These adhesions were taken down by Ligasure® (Covidien, Mansfield, MA). As we continued to free the cystic pedicle from the omentum, we discovered its connection to another large cyst. It became clear that this component of the mass was attached to the gastric wall at the lesser curvature. The mass extended posterior to the stomach into the lesser sac. The Ligasure was used to separate the mass from the gastric wall at the junction of the two. Traction on the stomach and counter-traction on the mass facilitated the identification of the plane of dissection. The posterior wall of the stomach could be clearly seen as the lesser sac was opened further. The mass was finally separated from the gastric mesentery, again using the Ligasure. After excision, the greater curvature was seen to be completely intact and uninvolved. The superior extent of the mass was clearly arising from the lesser curvature mesentery, and occupying the lesser sac. A lymphatic pedicle, twisted multiple times, attached this superior component to a large intra-abdominal lymphatic cyst. The stomach was tested for leak after the installation of dilute methylene blue through the nasogastric tube. None was identified. The mass was easily removed through the 10-mm supra-umbilical port. Her postoperative recovery was uneventful and, at 1-year follow-up, there was no recurrence. The case demonstrates the benefits of laparoscopy, and the techniques used to accomplish a safe, complete resection. No competing financial interests exist. Runtime of video: 5 mins Video presentation at IPEG's 19th Annual Congress for Endosurgery in Children, Waikoloa, Hawaii, June 8–12, 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoscopySame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207