MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Quantified H i morphology - IV. The merger fraction and rate in WHISP

2011· article· en· W1817751328 on OpenAlexaff
Benne W. Holwerda, Nor Pirzkal, W. J. G. de Blok, Antoine Bouchard, S.-L. Blyth, K. J. van der Heyden

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxySkySpiral galaxyMorphology (biology)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphology of the atomic hydrogen (H i) disc of a spiral galaxy is the first component to be disturbed by a gravitational interaction such as a merger between two galaxies. We use a simple parametrization of the morphology of H i column density maps of the Westerbork observations of neutral Hydrogen in Irregular and SPiral galaxies (WHISP) project to select those galaxies that are likely undergoing a significant interaction. Merging galaxies occupy a particular part of parameter space defined by Asymmetry (A), the relative contribution of the 20 per cent brightest pixels to the second-order moment of the column density map (M20) and the distribution of the second-order moment over all the pixels (GM). Based on their H i morphology, we find that 13 per cent of the WHISP galaxies are in an interaction (Concentration–M20) and only 7 per cent are based on close companions in the data cube. This apparent discrepancy can be attributed to the difference in visibility time-scales: mergers are identifiable as close pairs for 0.5 Gyr but are identifiable for ∼1 Gyr by their disturbed H i morphology. Expressed as volume merger rates, the two estimates agree very well: 7 and 6.8 × 10−3 mergers Gyr−1 Mpc−3 for paired and morphologically disturbed H i discs, respectively. The consistency of our merger fractions with those published for bigger surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey shows that H i morphology can be a very viable way to identify mergers in large H i surveys. The relatively high value for the volume merger rate may be a bias in the selection or WHISP volume. The expected abundance in high-resolution H i data by the planned South African Karoo Array Telescope (MeerKAT), Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP) and Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope/APERture Tile In Focus instrument (WSRT/APERTIF) radio observatories will reveal the importance of mergers in the local Universe and, with the advent of the Square Kilometer Array (SKA), over cosmic times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→