MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1818805863

Salish Women versus Women in the New Testament

2012· article· en· W1818805863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Raposo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of historical studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMormonism, Religion, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionNew TestamentOld TestamentCreaturesRepresentation (politics)ClubIndigenousStyle (visual arts)Gender studiesEmpowermentFeminization (sociology)HistorySociologyLiteratureArtPolitical scienceNatural (archaeology)LawPoliticsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through a series of short stories, Lee Maracle presents women as strong, empowered, resilient, sexual, and at times, mischievous creatures. The positive representations of Canadian Indigenous women in First Wives Club contrast the mostly negative or violent depictions of women in the New Testament. Though the New Testament contains some examples of active, well-respected women who are strong and faithful, more often, the New Testament ignores the presence of women and their perspectives and frequently suggests that women are inferior and subordinate to men. In this paper, I will argue that in her short stories, Maracle’s representations of women as strong, powerful, and necessary beings is directly opposed to the depiction of women in the New Testament. Unlike the message of the New Testament, Maracle's representation of female characters in First Wives Club: Coast Salish Style serves to show the reader that female empowerment is not only acceptable, but necessary in society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of historical studiesSame topicMormonism, Religion, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207