Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article introduit le numéro spécial consacré au 50e anniversaire de la Revue canadienne de sociologie. Nous y retraçons l'histoire de la revue au travers d'une analyse sommaire de ses éditeurs successifs et des articles et numéros spéciaux publiés au fil des ans. Depuis sa fondation, la Revue permet de suivre les plus récents développements du champ de la sociologie canadienne. L'analyse démontre que si les trente premières années de la Revue ont vu s'effectuer une transition du concept de culture à celui de relations de pouvoir en tant que thème central, les deux dernières décennies ont quant à elles été le lieu d'une diversification des perspectives théoriques et méthodologiques ainsi que d'un retour du “moment culturel”, s'insérant dorénavant dans le cadre d'une analyse plus générale des relations de pouvoir. Les articles du présent numéro illustrent et discutent ces développements. This article introduces the fiftieth anniversary issue of the Canadian Review of Sociology (CRS). It tracks the development of the CRS through rudimentary analyses of its editors, articles, and special‐issue themes. The CRS has provided a venue both for keeping pace with developments in Canadian sociology and for leading sociological research into new fields. If the first three decades of scholarship were marked by a transition from culture to power as an organizing motif, the two most recent decades have seen a diversification that recovers the cultural moment within a broader analysis of power, and that offers a wide range of theoretical and methodological perspectives. Articles featured in this issue exemplify and reflect on these developments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".