MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

‘Incurable Sores on Innocent Tongues’: The Language of Pain in World War I Poetry

2011· article· en· W1819409888 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nayef Ali Al-Joulan

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryThe HolocaustHumanitiesArtResistance (ecology)LiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper adopts Elaine Scarry’s ideas about the unsharability of pain through its resistance to language, by which pain not only resists language but also actively destroys it, and that pain can only be effectively described when the human voice only become visible. Through close analysis of a representative sample of World War I verse, this article examines the mechanisms war poets used to express pain. I turns out that these poets reflected anxieties against the difficulty of expressing and communicating pain and adopted visualizing and ekphrastic mechanisms and suggestive symbols to overcome that difficulty, by which they have managed to share pain and communicate it. Their broken grammar and lines, as well as the shattered music of their verses, are in themselves prerequisites for the truthful communication of pain. As such, they provided a mechanism by which any painful experience may be communicated, thus posing as successful advocates of revolt against all sorts of silencing and blinding public awareness. They are protectors of vision and voice. Key words : Language; Communication; Pain; World War I Poetry; Ekphrasis Resume: Ce document adopte les idees d'Elaine Scarry sur la nature non partageable de la douleur a travers sa resistance a la langue. La douleur peut non seulement resister a la langue mais aussi la detruire activement. Et la douleur ne peut etre efficacement decrite que lorsque la voix humaine devient visible. Grace a une analyse approfondie d'un echantillon representatif du verset de la Premiere Guerre mondiale, cet article examine les mecanismes des poetes de la guerre pour exprimer la douleur. Il s'avere que ces poetes ont reflete des angoisses contre la difficulte d'exprimer et la douleur de communiquer et ont adopte des mecanismes de visualisation, des mecanismes ekphrastiques et des symboles suggestifs pour surmonter cette difficulte, par lequel ils ont reussi a partager la douleur et la communiquer. Leurs grammaire et lignes brisees, ainsi que la musique brisee de leurs vers, sont en eux-memes des conditions prealables a la communication veridique de la douleur. Du coup, ils ont fourni un mecanisme par lequel toute experience douloureuse peut etre communiquee, ce qui se pose comme les defenseurs de la revolte contre toutes sortes de silence et de sensibilisation aveuglante du public. Ils sont les protecteurs de la vision et la voix. Mots-cles: Langue; Communication; Douleur; Poesie De La Premiere Guerre Mondiale; Ekphrastique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207