MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection of human platelet antigen‐1a alloantibodies in cases of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia using recombinant β3 integrin fragments coupled to fluorescently labeled beads

2010· article· en· W1821489359 on OpenAlexaff
Winnie Chong, Paul Metcalfe, Rosey Mushens, Geoff Lucas, Willem H. Ouwehand, Cristina Navarrete

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNHS Blood and TransplantUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsNeonatal alloimmune thrombocytopeniaAntigenRecombinant DNAAntibodyMonoclonal antibodyEpitopeMedicineImmunologyPlateletHuman leukocyte antigenIsoantibodiesPlatelet membrane glycoproteinBiotinylationMolecular biologyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Testing for alloantibodies against human platelet antigens (HPAs) is essential for the clinical diagnosis of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT), posttransfusion purpura, and platelet (PLT) refractoriness. Most of the methods currently used for HPA alloantibody detection rely on the availability of panels of HPA-typed PLTs and some rely on validated monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) against the PLT glycoproteins. Recombinant β3 integrins displaying the HPA-1a (rHPA-1a) or HPA-1b (rHPA-1b) epitopes have been produced as an alternative source of antigen. The suitability of these integrin fragments was evaluated for the development of an HPA-1a alloantibody screening assay, using Luminex xMAP technology. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 3-plex bead assay was developed by coupling biotinylated rHPA-1a, rHPA-1b, and recombinant glycoprotein VI to LumAvidin microspheres. Forty patient samples referred for FMAIT diagnostic testing, which were previously screened by the MoAb-specific immobilization of PLT antigens (MAIPA) assay, were used to assess the assay. RESULTS: The rHPA-1a- and rHPA-1b-coupled beads were able to detect HPA-1a and HPA-1b alloantibodies in all patient samples tested that were previously confirmed to contain HPA-1-specific antibodies. Furthermore, HLA Class I antibodies did not cross-react with the coupled beads. CONCLUSION: The 3-plex bead assay can be used to detect HPA-1a antibodies with sufficient specificity and sensitivity for use in the clinical setting of FMAIT. The development of other recombinant integrin fragments with the use of Luminex xMAP technology may assist in providing more rapid HPA antibody detection, enabling prompt diagnosis of alloimmune PLT disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207