MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1821538489 · doi:10.1002/9783527603978.mst0384

Thermodynamics and Phase Diagrams of Materials

2013· other· en· W1821538489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase diagramThermodynamicsGibbs free energyPhase ruleEquilibrium thermodynamicsCALPHADLiquidusMaterials scienceTernary operationSpinodal decompositionPhase (matter)ChemistryPhysicsThermodynamic equilibrium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The sections in this article are Introduction Notation Gibbs Energy and Equilibrium Gibbs Energy Chemical Equilibrium Predominance Diagrams Calculation of Predominance Diagrams Ellingham Diagrams as Predominance Diagrams Discussion of Predominance Diagrams Thermodynamics of Solutions Gibbs Energy of Mixing Chemical Potential Tangent Construction Gibbs–Duhem Equation Relative Partial Properties Activity Ideal Raoultian Solutions Excess Properties Activity Coefficient Multicomponent Solutions Binary Phase Diagrams Systems with Complete Solid and Liquid Miscibility Thermodynamic Origin of Phase Diagrams Pressure–Composition Phase Diagrams Minima and Maxima in Two‐Phase Regions Miscibility Gaps Simple Eutectic Systems Regular Solution Theory Thermodynamic Origin of Simple Phase Diagrams Illustrated by Regular Solution Theory Immiscibility–Monotectics Intermediate Phases Limited Mutual Solubility–Ideal Henrian Solutions Geometry of Binary Phase Diagrams Application of Thermodynamics to Phase Diagram Analysis Thermodynamic/Phase Diagram Optimization Polynomial Representation of Excess Properties Least‐Squares Optimization Calculation of Metastable Phase Boundaries Ternary and Multicomponent Phase Diagrams The Ternary Composition Triangle Ternary Space Model Polythermal Projections of Liquidus Surfaces Ternary Isothermal Sections Topology of Ternary Isothermal Sections Ternary Isopleths (Constant Composition Sections) Quasi‐Binary Phase Diagrams Multicomponent Phase Diagrams Nomenclature for Invariant Reactions Reciprocal Ternary Phase Diagrams Phase Diagrams with Potentials as Axes General Phase Diagram Geometry General Geometrical Rules for All True Phase Diagram Sections Zero Phase Fraction Lines Choice of Axes and Constants of True Phase Diagrams Tie‐lines Corresponding Phase Diagrams Theoretical Considerations Other Sets of Conjugate Pairs Solution Models Sublattice Models All Sublattices Except One Occupied by Only One Species Ionic Solutions Interstitial Solutions Ceramic Solutions The Compound Energy Formalism Non‐Stoichiometric Compounds Polymer Solutions Calculation of Limiting Slopes of Phase Boundaries Short‐Range Ordering Long‐Range Ordering Calculation of Ternary Phase Diagrams From Binary Data Minimization of Gibbs Energy Phase Diagram Calculation Bibliography Phase Diagram Compilations Thermodynamic Compilations General Reading

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it