Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The sections in this article are Introduction Notation Gibbs Energy and Equilibrium Gibbs Energy Chemical Equilibrium Predominance Diagrams Calculation of Predominance Diagrams Ellingham Diagrams as Predominance Diagrams Discussion of Predominance Diagrams Thermodynamics of Solutions Gibbs Energy of Mixing Chemical Potential Tangent Construction Gibbs–Duhem Equation Relative Partial Properties Activity Ideal Raoultian Solutions Excess Properties Activity Coefficient Multicomponent Solutions Binary Phase Diagrams Systems with Complete Solid and Liquid Miscibility Thermodynamic Origin of Phase Diagrams Pressure–Composition Phase Diagrams Minima and Maxima in Two‐Phase Regions Miscibility Gaps Simple Eutectic Systems Regular Solution Theory Thermodynamic Origin of Simple Phase Diagrams Illustrated by Regular Solution Theory Immiscibility–Monotectics Intermediate Phases Limited Mutual Solubility–Ideal Henrian Solutions Geometry of Binary Phase Diagrams Application of Thermodynamics to Phase Diagram Analysis Thermodynamic/Phase Diagram Optimization Polynomial Representation of Excess Properties Least‐Squares Optimization Calculation of Metastable Phase Boundaries Ternary and Multicomponent Phase Diagrams The Ternary Composition Triangle Ternary Space Model Polythermal Projections of Liquidus Surfaces Ternary Isothermal Sections Topology of Ternary Isothermal Sections Ternary Isopleths (Constant Composition Sections) Quasi‐Binary Phase Diagrams Multicomponent Phase Diagrams Nomenclature for Invariant Reactions Reciprocal Ternary Phase Diagrams Phase Diagrams with Potentials as Axes General Phase Diagram Geometry General Geometrical Rules for All True Phase Diagram Sections Zero Phase Fraction Lines Choice of Axes and Constants of True Phase Diagrams Tie‐lines Corresponding Phase Diagrams Theoretical Considerations Other Sets of Conjugate Pairs Solution Models Sublattice Models All Sublattices Except One Occupied by Only One Species Ionic Solutions Interstitial Solutions Ceramic Solutions The Compound Energy Formalism Non‐Stoichiometric Compounds Polymer Solutions Calculation of Limiting Slopes of Phase Boundaries Short‐Range Ordering Long‐Range Ordering Calculation of Ternary Phase Diagrams From Binary Data Minimization of Gibbs Energy Phase Diagram Calculation Bibliography Phase Diagram Compilations Thermodynamic Compilations General Reading
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".