Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Introduction Mia Roennmar Part 1 Labour Law, the Protection of Fundamental Rights and the Tension between Economic and Social Integration in the EU 2. The ILO Acquis and EU Labour Law Petra Herzfeld Olsson 3. The Right to Collective Action - in Particular the Right to Strike - as a Fundamental Right OErjan Edstroem 4. Regulating Posted Work - Before and After the Laval Quartet Jonas Malmberg 5. Public Procurement and Labour Law - Friends or Foes? Kerstin Ahlberg and Niklas Bruun Part 2 Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination 6. EU Equality Law - Comprehensive and Truly Transformative? Ann Numhauser-Henning 7. Troublesome Transformation - EU Law on Pregnancy and Maternity Turned into Swedish Law on Parental Leave Jenny Julen Votinius 8. Flexicurity, Labour Law and the Notion of Equal Treatment Mia Roennmar viii Table of Contents Part 3 Social Security Law and Free Movement and Coordination in the EU 9. The Swedish Parental Benefit in Relation to the EU rules on Coordination of Social Security Benefit - Is Free Movement of Families Really Achieved? Emma Holm 10. The Swedish Social Security Reforms of 2008 and their Impact on the National Sickness Insurance System: Some Reflections from an EU Law and Flexicurity Perspective Per Norberg The Swedish Labour Court judgment AD 2009 No 89, translated into English by Jur. Dr Laura Carlson
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".