Labour law, fundamental rights and social Europe
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Introduction Mia Roennmar Part 1 Labour Law, the Protection of Fundamental Rights and the Tension between Economic and Social Integration in the EU 2. The ILO Acquis and EU Labour Law Petra Herzfeld Olsson 3. The Right to Collective Action - in Particular the Right to Strike - as a Fundamental Right OErjan Edstroem 4. Regulating Posted Work - Before and After the Laval Quartet Jonas Malmberg 5. Public Procurement and Labour Law - Friends or Foes? Kerstin Ahlberg and Niklas Bruun Part 2 Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination 6. EU Equality Law - Comprehensive and Truly Transformative? Ann Numhauser-Henning 7. Troublesome Transformation - EU Law on Pregnancy and Maternity Turned into Swedish Law on Parental Leave Jenny Julen Votinius 8. Flexicurity, Labour Law and the Notion of Equal Treatment Mia Roennmar viii Table of Contents Part 3 Social Security Law and Free Movement and Coordination in the EU 9. The Swedish Parental Benefit in Relation to the EU rules on Coordination of Social Security Benefit - Is Free Movement of Families Really Achieved? Emma Holm 10. The Swedish Social Security Reforms of 2008 and their Impact on the National Sickness Insurance System: Some Reflections from an EU Law and Flexicurity Perspective Per Norberg The Swedish Labour Court judgment AD 2009 No 89, translated into English by Jur. Dr Laura Carlson
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it