An Inconvenient Truth? Scientific Photography and Archival Ambivalence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the earliest days of the photograph to the present, its value has been recognized by the scientific community to help them document and understand the natural world. Photography archivists at Library and Archives Canada (and its predecessors) have long recognized the importance of survey photography in documenting various attempts to conquer the vast geography of Canada. But more often than not, such photographs were acquired for their cultural and historical (nation building) importance rather than their scientific utility. Archivists’ education and training has often led us to neglect the potential scientific value of such records. The Mountain Legacy Project/Rocky Mountain Repeat Photography Project is a partnership project between Library and Archives Canada and the Environmental Studies Department of the University of Victoria. In brief, the project uses historical phototopographic survey images (held at LAC) taken in the Rocky Mountains, and exact repeat images taken today, to allow scientists to conduct detailed comparativechange analysis on the mountain landscape. With the increasing attention being paid to climate change in Canada and around the world, the project is timely. However, the creation and use of the historic images opens up a number of broader questions for the archival community. The large collection of photographs raises longstanding issues about appraisal and acquisition decisions regarding scientific records, and the value of such records. At the same time, these photographs open up a window to understanding a sometimes neglected yet foundational tradition in documentary photography: the scientific photograph. RESUME Depuis les tout premiers jours de la photographie jusqu’a nos jours, sa valeur a ete reconnue par la communaute scientifique afin de lui permettre de documenter et de comprendre le monde naturel. Les archivistes de la photographie a Bibliotheque et Archives Canada (et ses predecesseurs) ont longtemps reconnu l’importance de la photographie d’arpentage afin de decrire les dif ferents efforts pour conquerir la vaste geographie du Canada. Dans la plupart des cas, cependant, des photographies de ce genre ont ete acquises pour leur importance culturelle et historique (« nation building »), plutot que pour leur utilite scientifique. L’education et la formation des archivistes les ont souvent menes a negliger la valeur scientifique potentielle de tels documents. L’initiative Mountain Legacy Project/Rocky Mountain Repeat Photography Project est un projet de partenariat entre Bibliotheque et Archives Canada et le Departement d’etudes environnementales de la University of Victoria. En bref, ce projet se sert d’images d’arpentage photo-topographiques historiques des Rocheuses (conservees a BAC) et des images contemporaines de ces memes emplacements, afin de permettre aux scientifiques de mener une analyse comparee detaillee des changements survenus au paysage montagneux. Puisqu’on s’interesse davantage au Canada et dans le monde entier au changement climatique, le projet est d’actualite. Cependant, la creation et la consultation des images historiques engendrent un nombre de questions plus larges pour la communaute archivistique. La grande collection de photographies suscite des questions par rapport a l’evaluation et l’acquisition des documents scientifiques et la valeur de ce genre de documents qui ne sont pas nouvelles. En meme temps, ces photographies ouvrent une nouvelle fenetre qui permet de mieux comprendre une tradition fondamentale de la photographie documentaire parfois negligee, la photographie scientifique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it