Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay argues for a broader appreciation of Pauline Johnson’s creative range and poetic accomplishment. Rereading her work in relation to some of J. Edward Chamberlin’s ideas about narrative and about home brings fresh perspectives to her writing and reception in relation to her reversal of the White masculine gaze in her representations of Native peoples, Canadian history, wilderness, and gender. Her first Euro-Canadian audience used her work to assist with their own indigenization and help them feel at home in Canada. Because most current readers construct Johnson as figure of resistance, concentrating on a small selection of her poetry on Native topics, they continue to ignore her poems that invoke a female voice to possess the wilderness, along with her innovative erotic verse that reinhabits the female body by empowering the female gaze. Abstract: Cet article veut encourager une plus grande appreciation de la portee creative et des accomplissements poetiques de Pauline Johnson. Une relecture de ses œuvres a la lumiere de certaines des idees de J. Edward Chamberlin sur les histoires et leur provenance permet d’examiner ses œuvres et leur reception avec des yeux nouveaux en ce qui concerne son inversion du point de vue de l’homme blanc dans ses representations des peuples auto-chtones, de l’histoire canadienne, de la nature sauvage et des relations hommes-femmes. Ses premiers auditoires euro-canadiens se sont servis de ses œuvres pour les aider dans leur propre indigenisation afin de se sentir plus a l’aise au Canada. Comme la plupart des lecteurs percoivent Pauline Johnson comme une image de la resistance et se concentrent sur une petite selection de sa poesie sur des sujets autochtones, ils continuent de ne pas porter attention a ses poemes invoquant la parole feminine pour prendre possession de la nature sauvage, ainsi que de ses vers erotiques innovateurs qui habilitent le point de vue feminin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".