MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1823631253 · doi:10.1109/pac.1999.792363

Tank1 of the ISAC-DTL LINAC

2003· article· en· W1823631253 on OpenAlexaff
P. Bricault, R. Poirier, T. Ries, Robin Roper, G. Stanford

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear particle acceleratorNuclear engineeringSeparator (oil production)PhysicsParticle acceleratorBeam (structure)IonDrift tubeNuclear physicsRadio frequencyIon sourceMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringOpticsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first phase of the ISAC radioactive ion beam facility at TRIUMF is now completed. It combines an isotope separator-on-line with a post accelerator. In the second phase a drift-tube LINAC is required to accelerate ions with a charge to mass ratio /spl ges/1/6 from E=0.15 MeV/u to a final energy fully variable up to 1.5 MeV/u. Due to the relatively low intensities of some of the radioactive ion species continuous (cw) operation of the accelerator is preferred. An interdigital H type RF structure is chosen because of its very high shunt impedance. The ISAC-DTL is composed of five IH tanks and three rebunchers, operating at 105 MHz. The basic design of the structure is similar to other IH structures with the exception that the stems are water-cooled. The features of this mechanical design will be discussed and the first results of the RF tests are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207