MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1824490275 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.1990.171543

High resolution deconvolution using least-absolute-values minimization (US NDE)

2002· article· en· W1824490275 on OpenAlex
M. S. O’Brien, Anthony N. Sinclair, Simon Kramer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsHydro One (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCANDU Owners Group
KeywordsDeconvolutionMinificationImpulse responseBlind deconvolutionComputer scienceNorm (philosophy)AlgorithmImpulse (physics)Nondestructive testingAcousticsMathematicsMathematical optimizationPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-resolution deconvolution technique for improving temporal resolution in ultrasonic nondestructive-evaluation signals was investigated. Least-absolute-values (L1 norm) minimization was applied to the deconvolution process for systems whose impulse responses can be modeled as sparsely filled series of spikes. Particular attention was given to the relative performance in the presence of noise of this method as compared to the least-squares (L2 norm) method. There are clear indications that the L1 approach is superior for this type of system. The issue of objectively choosing the damping parameter employed by this technique was also addressed. The method and results from these investigations have been applied to ultrasonic inspection signals from nuclear reactor pressure tubes with good results.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it