The Preliminary Discussion on the Historical Comparison between Chinese and Western Acquisitive Prescription Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The acquisitive prescription was a type of system in Roman law used for making up the deficiencies under the formal doctrine as well as the power vacuum caused by wars. The elements influencing the emergence of the system also included historical cultures, geographical environments, and relationships with other systems, etc. The “Qing She” system in ancient China was a provisional measure made by feudal dynasties in particular war times to restore agricultural production and as well improve tax revenue. There were some similarities between the system and the acquisitive prescription; nonetheless there were fundamental difference between two of them in terms of causes, system values, applicable scopes, and cultural foundations, etc. There were no such historical traditions in China universally suitable for the acquisitive prescription. Key words: Acquisitive prescription; Qing She; Historical comparisonResume: La prescription acquisitive etait un type de systeme dans les droits romains utilise pour la confection des lacunes sous de la doctrine officielle, ainsi que le vide du pouvoir cause par les guerres. Les elements qui influent sur l'emergence du systeme inclus aussi des cultures historiques, des environnements geographiques et les relations avec d'autres systemes, etc. Le systeme Qing She dans la Chine ancienne etait une mesure provisoire faite par les feodales de dynasties durant les annees de guerre notamment pour restaurer la production agricole et ainsi ameliorer les recettes fiscales. Il y avait des similitudes entre le systeme et de la prescription acquisitive; neanmoins il y avait de difference fondamentale entre deux d'entre eux en termes de causes, les valeurs du systeme, les champs applicables, et les fondations culturelles, etc Il n'y avait pas de telles traditions historiques en Chine universellement approprier pour la la prescription acquisitive. Mots cles: Prescription acquisitive; Qing She; Et la comparaison historique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".