MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On C-E Translation of Public Signs

2010· article· en· W1824752212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ling Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesLinguisticsPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public signs in English are windows of China to Foreigners. This paper discusses the linguistic and functional features of English public signs, moreover, it puts forward five approaches to dealing with the translation of the public signs in Chinese to the public signs in English. Keywords: public signs, linguistic feature, functional feature, C-E translation Resume L’article present analyse les caracteristiques langagieres et fonctionnelles du langage d’annonce, et propose cinq techniques de traduction du langage d’annonce chinois en anglais sous l’angle de la semiotique sociale. Mots-cles: langage d’annonce, caracteristiques langagieres, caracteristiques fonctionnelles, traduction du chinois en anglais 摘 要 本文分析了英語公示語的語言特點和功能特點,並從社會符號學翻譯法的角度提出了五種公示語漢 譯英方法和技巧。 關鍵詞:公示語;語言特點;功能特點;漢英翻譯

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityFrench-language works237,207