MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1825210022 · doi:10.1002/ana.24215

Genetic association signal near <scp><i>NTN</i></scp><i>4</i> in <scp>T</scp>ourette syndrome

2014· review· en· W1825210022 on OpenAlexaff
Peristera Paschou, Dongmei Yu, Gloria F. Gerber, Patrick Evans, Fotis Tsetsos, Lea K. Davis, Iordanis Karagiannidis, Jonathan Chaponis, Eric R. Gamazon, Kirsten Mueller‐Vahl, Manfred Stuhrmann, Monika Schloegelhofer, M. Stamenković, Johannes Hebebrand, Markus M. Nöethen, Péter Nagy, Csaba Barta, Zsanett Tárnok, Renata Rizzo, Christel Depienne, Yulia Worbe, Andreas Hartmann, Daniëlle C. Cath, Cathy L. Budman, Paul Sandor, Cathy L. Barr, Tomasz Wolańczyk, Harvey Singer, I‐Ching Chou, Marco A. Grados, Daniëlle Posthuma, Guy A. Rouleau, H.N. Aschauer, Nelson B. Freimer, David L. Pauls, Nancy J. Cox, Carol A. Mathews, Jeremiah M. Scharf

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurology · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalOntario HIV Treatment NetworkMcGill UniversityUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyBonferroni correctionSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenetic associationAlleleTourette syndromeGeneticsPutamenEtiologyBiologyMedicineInternal medicineNeuroscienceGenotypeGenePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a complex genetic etiology. Through an international collaboration, we genotyped 42 single nucleotide polymorphisms (p < 10(-3) ) from the recent TS genomewide association study (GWAS) in 609 independent cases and 610 ancestry-matched controls. Only rs2060546 on chromosome 12q22 (p = 3.3 × 10(-4) ) remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Meta-analysis with the original GWAS yielded the strongest association to date (p = 5.8 × 10(-7) ). Although its functional significance is unclear, rs2060546 lies closest to NTN4, an axon guidance molecule expressed in developing striatum. Risk score analysis significantly predicted case-control status (p = 0.042), suggesting that many of these variants are true TS risk alleles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of NeurologySame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207