The Politics of Gender: Feminist Implications of Gender Inversions from M. Butterfly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The issue of gender has been discussed in terms of postcolonial feminism as a political tool, and the intervention of race makes the problem more complicated. The Chinese-American playwright David Henry Hwang makes a self-conscious move and inverts the gender identities of his characters Gallimard and Song. This paper analyzes the inversions and the corresponding implications from various viewpoints: the stereotype and fetishism, the problem of discourse power, and Homi Bhabha’s theory of the third space and Woolf’s androgyny vision. Oriental women have long been fetishized into a stereotype; they are depicted as submissive and passive, and are silenced by the double pressure from race and sex. In M. Butterfly, the stereotype is crushed by gender obscurity and inversion, and the articulation power is handed over to a person in the “third space” with hybrid identity. This masquerade can be seen as a process of self seeking and re-identification, in which Hwang installs his philosophy in feminism and provides his method for females, especially Oriental females, and this paper recovers the philosophy and exploration his contribution to postcolonial feminism in detail. Key words: Gender Inversion; M. Butterfly; Stereotype; Discourse Power; Third Space; Androgyny Resume: La question de genre a ete discutee en termes du feminisme postcolonial comme un outil politique, et l'intervention de la race rend le probleme plus complique. Le dramaturge sino-americain David Henry Hwang fait une demarche de conscience de soi et inverse les identites de genre de ses personnages Gallimard et Song. Cet article analyse les interversions et les implications correspondantes des points de vue differents: le stereotype et le fetichisme, le probleme du pouvoir de discours, la theorie du d'Homi Bhabha et la vision androgyne de Woolf. Les femmes orientales ont longtemps ete fetichisee dans un stereotype; elles sont depeintes comme soumises et passives, et sont reduites au silence par la double pression de la race et du sexe. Dans Madame Papillon, le stereotype est ecrase par l'obscurite et l'interversion des sexes et le pouvoir d'articulation est remis a une personne dans le troisieme espace avec l'identite hybride. Cette mascarade peut etre vue comme un processus de recherche de soi et de re-identification, dans lequel Hwang installe sa philosophie dans le feminisme et fournit sa methode pour les femmes, en particulier les femmes orientales, et cet article reprend la philosophie et l'exploration de sa contribution au feminisme postcolonial en detail. Mots-cles: Interversion Des Sexes; Madame Papillon; StEREOtype; Puissance de Discours; TroisiEMe Espace; Androgynie
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".