MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1825676009 · doi:10.21083/surg.v6i2.2216

'The Changeling,' or how Bacon’s closet becomes the cabinet of curiosities

2013· article· en· W1825676009 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Abigail Slinger

Bibliographic record

VenueSURG Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosetCabinet (room)PraisePhilosophyMetaphysicsInterpretation (philosophy)ArtLiteratureTheologyHistoryLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First licensed by the Master of the Revels in 1622, The Changeling opened to London playgoers who were in some measure familiar with Bacon's praise of inductive reasoning in Novum Organum (1620). It is therefore of note to find that the protagonist of Middleton and Rowley's play, Beatrice-Joanna, consistently undermines what Michael Neill describes as "the ... correspondence of outward appearance and inward reality” (xx); induction cannot reveal moral worth. The closet of experimentation that contains this incongruously unchaste virgin thus transforms into a cabinet of curiosities whose contents resist accepted logic and simple assumptions. Keywords: The Changeling (Middleton, Thomas and Rowley, William); Novum Organum (Bacon, Francis); metaphysics; empirical (Baconian) method (rejection of); cabinet of curiosities; literary interpretation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.057
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSURG JournalSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207