MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bioefficacy and mode of action of rocaglamide from <i>Aglaia elaeagnoidea</i> (syn. <i>A. roxburghiana</i>) against gram pod borer, <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> (Hübner)

2004· article· en· W1826750127 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Entomology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhytochemical compounds biological activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsAzadirachtinHelicoverpa armigeraBiologyInstarLarvaToxicologyTraditional medicineBotanyPesticideMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Rocaglamide, a highly substituted benzofuran, was isolated and identified as the main biologically active component in Aglaia elaeagnoidea (syn. A. roxburghiana ) for gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Addition of rocaglamide to an artificial diet retarded the growth of neonate larvae in a dose‐dependent manner with EC 50 values of 0.76 p.p.m. These values compared favourably with azadirachtin (EC 50 = 0.23 p.p.m.). However, azadirachtin was apparently more potent than rocaglamide in inducing growth inhibition via oral administration to these first stadium larvae. The candidate compound was found to have LD 50 and LD 95 values of 0.40 and 1.02 μ g per larva, respectively, in topical application against third instar larvae 96 h post‐treatment. However, these values for azadirachtin were 8.16 and 25.8 μ g per larva for the same period. This shows that azadirachtin was less effective against third instar H. armigera larvae in inducing acute toxicity via topical treatment in comparison with rocaglamide. However, severe morphological larval deformities were observed in such azadirachtin‐treated larvae during the process of ecdysis. The cytotoxic nature of rocaglamide was established by evaluating dietary utilization and the results did not implicate any antifeedant effect but the toxicity‐mediated effect due to reduced efficiency of conversion of ingested food. It was obvious that feeding deterrence is not the primary mode of action but a centrally mediated effect, which could be due to the induced cytotoxicity at non‐specific cellular levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it