Small Scale Renewable Energy Resources Assessment for Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is intended as a preliminary review and analysis of the potential for small \nscale hydro and wind projects on the island of Newfoundland, Canada. Despite good \nwind and hydro resources the province uses thermal generation for about 20% of its \nenergy requirements. Currently, Newfoundland is considering a multi billion dollar \ntransmission line to bring hydro power from Labrador to the island and replace thermal \ngeneration. The alternative given by the province is to continue with one of various \nthermal generation options. This study is intended to determine whether small scale \nhydro and wind energy projects warrant consideration as another future generation option, \nand whether they could potentially replace thermal generation. To determine the total \npotential for small hydro and wind within the island power system several different areas \nare studied. Firstly, updated hydro resource potential is considered through RETScreen \nanalysis of sites from a previous small hydro study. Wind resource potential is also \nanalysed briefly using both island resource information and wind penetration research to \ngauge total potential. Finally, the ability of these projects to meet future energy demand is \nanalysed through simplified island system simulations. It was found that there is a very \nlarge small hydro and wind resource potential available on the island and that these small \nprojects merit consideration as a future generation option, with the potential to replace \nthermal generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".