Prolonged dormancy in the geophyte <i>Allium amplectens</i> on Vancouver Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prolonged dormancy occurs when a plant fails to appear above ground during the growing season. Although it may be an important life history trait of many geophytes, studies focusing on prolonged dormancy are infrequent and are concentrated on the Orchidaceae even though the phenomenon occurs in many taxonomic groups. We tracked individual plants of Allium amplectens (Amaryllidaceae) in permanent plots on Vancouver Island, which allowed us to determine rates of prolonged dormancy during a 4-year period. Dormancy rates per year averaged 38% and differed substantially among years. Over 70% of plants had a dormant period during the study. Dormancy periods of 2 years were almost as frequent as 1-year periods, and 8% of plants were dormant for 3 years. Plant density, which included small plants that we could not track in the plots, varied much more among years than did dormancy of tracked plants, suggesting that small plants may be especially prone to dormancy. High rates of prolonged dormancy and frequent multiyear dormancy indicate that this is an important life history feature of A. amplectens. We suggest that prolonged dormancy contributes to the ability of this species, and probably other species, to persist in dry habitats with fluctuating resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".