Do obese children experience more severe fractures than nonobese children? A cross-sectional study from a paediatric emergency department
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is an association between childhood obesity and severe extremity fractures. Associations between obesity and complications related to the fracture and/or fracture management were also examined. METHODS: The present study was a retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care children's emergency department. Eligible cases for review were children (two to 17 years of age) with an extremity fracture. Severe extremity fractures were defined as those requiring manipulation under anesthesia, open operative repair and/or admission to hospital. The primary outcome was the proportion of severe extremity fractures and the secondary outcome was the proportion of complications. RESULTS: A total of 1340 charts of children who presented with extremity fracture from January 2008 to December 2010 were reviewed. The mean (± SD) age of the study population was 9.1±4.0 years and 62.1% were male. Overall, 19.9% (95% CI 17.8% to 22.0%) were obese and 39.6% (95% CI 36.7% to 39.1%) sustained a severe extremity fracture. The OR of severe extremity fractures among obese versus nonobese children was 1.00 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.32), adjusted for age, sex and mechanism of injury. In addition, the OR of experiencing complications among obese relative to nonobese children was 1.12 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.85). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrated that in children with extremity fractures, obese children were not at increased risk for sustaining more severe extremity fractures or subsequent complications compared with nonobese children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".