MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rational Criticism on Technology of Visual Culture's Spreading

2010· article· en· W1829146925 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mei Qiong-lin, Li-hui Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriticismAmusementValue (mathematics)SociologyAestheticsMedia studiesPsychologyArtLiteratureComputer scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual culture has been the fact in the field of culture and communicates today. Visual culture communicates has been a great challenge to traditional culture communicate. From the visual change, people’s living surroundings are also be changed. Rational thought depending language gives way to sensible thought depending sight, image displace language become the tool of thought. The image world which focuses on technology hegemony is a world made of message and sign which are dominated by mode, code and control demonstration. Media of “unreality implosion” made illusory equal to the reality is present. There are more and more super-real and super-clear images. Today, people lack of communicate; they dislike talk to each other; there’re lots of misunderstandings in modern society. The day of post-technology provide people with several new Medias and communicative ways. Everyone can be the subject by using the new media of high technology but low-skill operating. At the back of technology, there are many kinds of communication texts. The culture value orientation of Mass communication becomes amusing and ordinary. The communicate bureau’s value conception and behaviors cosmos in post-technology times become more instability. Keywords: visual culture, media technology, post-technology times, amusement Resume La culture visuelle est deja devenue la realite dans les domaines de culture et de diffusion. La diffusion de la culture visuelle constitue un defi considerable pour la diffusion culturelle traditionnelle. Le « virage visuel » qu’il s’en suit change l’environnement d’existance de l’homme : la reflexion rationnelle tablant sur la langue fait place a la pensee sensible s’appuyant sur la vision ; l’image devient l’outil de la pensee en remplacant la langue. Le monde des images fictives ayant pour foyer la suprematie technique est un monde des informations et signes domine par le modele, le code, le signe, et la cybernetique. Les medias font egaler la realite ficfive et la realite presente par « l’explosion interne » de la realite. Des images visuelles super-reelles et super-claires arrivent a flot continu. Donc, le grand publique se tait, on manque de communication et s’enferment sur soi-meme. La societe, pleine de malententus, deperit faute de feedback. Les nouveaux medias qui demandent peu de technique permettent a chacun de devenir le sujet de l’action de diffusion. La nouvelle ere ou la diffusion individuelle et la diffusion de masse s’entremelent est ainsi creee. Avec le soutien de la technique, des contenus de diffusion de toutes sortes apparaissent sous nos yeux. La diffusion de masse tend au divertissement et sa valeur culturelle diminue. La notion de valeur et l’ordre d’action des groupes sociaux de diffusion a l’epoque post-technique prennent une caracteristique instable. Mots-cles : culture visuelle, technique de diffusion, epoque post-technique, tendance au divertissement 摘 要 視覺文化己經成為當下文化領域和傳播領域的現實。視覺文化傳播對傳統的文化傳播構成了巨大的挑戰。由此引發的“視覺轉向”改變了人的生存環境,依賴語言的理性思考讓位於視覺的感性思維,圖像取代語言成為思維的工具。以技術霸權為焦點的擬像世界是一個由模型、符碼和控制論所支配的資訊與符號的世界。傳媒以一種“真實的內爆”使虛幻和在場的真實等同。超真實、超清晰的視覺圖像紛至遝來。於是,大眾緘默,當代人缺乏交流、封閉心靈、充滿誤解與誤讀,社會也因缺乏回饋而消隱。 低技能操作的新媒體,每個人都可以成為傳播行為的主體,並由此開創了個人傳播和大眾傳播交融的新局面,在技術支援下,參差不齊的傳播內容頻頻出現在人們眼前,大眾傳播的文化價值取向走向娛樂化、低微化。後技術時代的傳播社群的價值觀念與行為秩序出現不穩定性。 關鍵詞:視覺文化;媒介技術;後技術時代;娛樂化

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.035
Scholarly communication0.0130.010
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207