Design of plant-specific PCR primers for the ETS region with enhanced specificity for tribe<i>Bromeae</i>and their application to other grasses (<i>Poaceae</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selective primers were developed for the amplification via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) region in the nuclear ribosomal repeat unit. These primers were intended to be specific to the Poaceae tribe Bromeae but were found to function broadly across subfamily Pooideae. ETS primers previously developed for grasses were unable to amplify tribe Bromeae taxa because of ETS variability and several subrepeats. After detailed analysis, a region was chosen and four candidate primers were designed to amplify and sequence the ETS fragment. This fragment of approximately 800–900 bp is located in the 3′ region of the ETS of 18S–26S nuclear ribosomal DNA. A preliminary study with these primers was conducted in eight samples of Bromus. The best two primers showed strong amplification and successful sequencing for all samples tested. We also tested the specificity of these two primers in samples belonging to all large taxa of Bromeae, including all three genera and five subgenera and samples of eight tribes and 15 subtribes of the subfamily Pooideae, and both worked for most of the taxa tested. Our results demonstrate that the ETS region is more informative for resolving relationships at different taxonomic levels than internal transcribed spacer region. Also, these results indicate the utility of these new primers for studying the ETS region in the tribe Bromeae as well as across the subfamily Pooideae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".