MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1829980267

Wind turbine noise primer

2006· article· es· W1829980267 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Beth D. Regan, Timothy G. Casey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetbackTurbineWind powerNoise (video)AerodynamicsNoise pollutionMarine engineeringEngineeringNoise controlComputer scienceAcousticsAerospace engineeringNoise reductionElectrical engineeringCivil engineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wind turbine is a modern machine that generates electricity from wind.Wind turbines generate four types of noise: tonal, broadband, low frequency, and impulsive.Another way to look at wind turbine noise is to consider its sources.There are two fundamental categories, mechanical and aerodynamic.Mechanical noise is transmitted along the structure o f the turbine and is radiated from its surfaces.Aerodynamic noise is produced by the flow o f air over the blades.In the United States, wind farm siting often requires compliance with state and/or local noise regulations.Common practice is to determine minimum setback distances from residences to comply with the most stringent noise limit.Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a valuable tool in this type o f analysis, particularly when current aerial photographs are available in GIS-ready format.Although recent technology advances has decreased overall noise levels, tonal noise still remains a concern during the planning process.Detailed meteorological data is available for most portions o f the United States, however it is not commonly used to evaluate wind turbine noise.The authors o f this paper are studying the creation o f a GIS-based model that utilizes detailed met data in the propagation o f wind turbine noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207