Studies of carbohydrate structure, properties and interactions by nmr spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this thesis the structure, properties and interactions of different types of carbohydrates were investigated by NMR spectroscopy. The structures of kappa- (κ) and kappa/mu- (κ/μ) carrageenan oligosaccharides were analyzed by studying the hydroxy protons. It was shown that a hydrogen bonding interaction is present across the 1-4 glycosidic linkages of μ-carrabiose in the κμκ hexa- and κμμκ octasaccharides. The occurrence of hydrogen bonding in κ/μ-carrageenan oligosaccharides may suggest that μ-carrabiose units, mostly found in the non-helicoidal regions of κ-carrageenans have an underestimated role in the structural organization of the κ-carrageenan gel network. Hydroxy proton NMR was also used to study the effect of trehalose on the hydration and hydrogen bonding in lactose in aqueous solutions. The small effects of trehalose on the hydration and hydrogen bonding interaction in lactose were very similar to those found for sucrose. The results suggested that, at concentrations below 40% (w/w), it is the concentration of hydroxy groups that governs sugar-sugar and sugar-water interactions rather than the type of sugar. A method using diffusion-edited NMR spectroscopy was developed for solvent suppression when determining the mannuronic (M) to guluronic (M) acid ratio in alginate polysaccharides. The method could be employed to determine the M/G-ratio at temperatures below 50 °C. Through all of the work in the thesis diffusion-edited NMR experiments also proved to be practical for studies of biomolecules, to for example selectively remove interfering signals from buffer to enable the interpretation of sample signals. The activities and specificities of four different glycosaminoglycan (GAG) sulfatases from the human gut commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron were determined. One of the sulfatases, BT3349, was found to be the first bacterial GAG endolytic-O-sulfatase, with chondroitin specific GalNAc-4-O-sulfatase activity. The other three enzymes were shown to possess strictly exolytic activity, BT3333 as a GalNAc-6-O-sulfatase, BT4656 as a GlcNAc-6-O-sulfatase and the third one, BT1596, as a Δ-4-hexuronate-2-O-sulfatase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".