Longterm followup of childhood lupus nephritis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the longterm outcome in children with onset of lupus nephritis before 18 years of age. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with onset of lupus nephritis prior to age 18 were identified. The mean followup time was 11 years (range 5-19). The mean age at diagnosis was 13.2 years (range 4-17). The male:female ratio was 1:3.8. Renal biopsies were classified using the WHO classification. Fifteen patients had Class II, 8 patients Class III, 32 patients Class IV, and 11 patients Class V and one patient refused biopsy. The cohort consists of the 66 patients who had a renal biopsy. Five patients received cyclophosphamide (CYC) and 17 received azathioprine (AZA) as part of the initial treatment of Class IV nephritis. Eight additional patients received CYC because of a flare of disease while receiving AZA, and 8 other patients received AZA because of a flare of disease while taking prednisone therapy. RESULTS: Four patients died; 6 developed endstage renal disease (ESRD); all but one of the patients who died and/or had ESRD had WHO Class IV [diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN)]; only 2 Caucasians developed ESRD, although 16 out of 36 Caucasians had DPGN; serum creatinine at followup was normal in 84% of the survivors; presently 70% of the patients take less than 7.5 mg prednisone/day and 62% do not take cytotoxic drugs. No patient is currently treated with CYC. All 8 patients with Class III nephritis were taking medication at last followup. CONCLUSION: The longterm outcome in this group of children with lupus nephritis, in whom AZA was the most commonly used immunosuppressive agent, was excellent, with 94% patient survival at a mean followup of 11 years. Our results suggest that non-Caucasian patients with pediatric onset lupus nephritis may be at increased risk for renal failure compared to Caucasians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".