MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1831691180 · doi:10.5539/emr.v4n2p70

An Empirical Model for Industrial Generator’s Capacity Requirement Determination

2015· article· en· W1831691180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Management Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenerator (circuit theory)Nameplate capacityComputationSelection (genetic algorithm)ProductivityProduction (economics)Capacity utilizationElectrical loadComputer scienceEngineeringPower (physics)Reliability engineeringIndustrial engineeringOperations researchElectricity generationEconomicsElectrical engineeringMicroeconomicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>In our community today, the existence of Power Holding Company of Nigeria can only help for a short period when it is available. In some areas, it is not available at all. Therefore, there is always need for generator as back up or continuous use in our industries. Determination of capacity of generator to procure is always a problem. Some company by error purchased generators that cannot carry the load of their industries. This always led to load shed either on machines or the entire facilities they have. This is due to the fact that the capacity of the generator required was not predetermined and also the expansion of the companies in the nearest future was not considered. This had contributed to the low productivity of many companies because of their inability to meet their monthly as well as yearly production targets. Hence the development of a model for the appropriate generator capacity selection for industrial installation which is empirically oriented. Developing an empirical model for this selection involves adequate understanding of electrical load distributions, variations and utilities connected to the electrical load of the generator. Parameters for industrial generator capacity were identified, mathematical model for each parameter were determined and integrated to form a unique model for decision making. The identified parameters are: capacity utilization, diversity factors, deration factor and usage type. The scenarios for computation were three based on the type of load required. This load were identified to be existing load, new and future loads. The developed models were applied using Honeywell foods (FMCG) company as case study under the first scenario. The load analysis for both the non-factory and factory load gave Summation of 531.47kW with power factor of 0.8 gave a converted value of 664.34kVA. The total variation factor gotten is 0.765 with 0.85 capacity utilization factor and diversity factor was 0.9. Application of total variation factor gave the converted load of 664.kVA and new load value of 508 kVA. Using power factor of 0.8 resulted into 406kW the generator considerations were derating factor of 0.75 and usage type factor (which is continuous) is 1 or 100%. The final determined generator capacity for this case study using derating factor of 0.75 made the required capacity to be 677kVA, and 542kW.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.101 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it